The Health Care Cost Monitor is made possible by Supporting Members of The Hastings Center. Please give today.
-
Recent Posts
Connect with Us
Weekly Email Alerts
Print Edition
Contributors
- Adam Oliver
- Alain Enthoven
- Andrew G. Biggs
- Anthony Marfeo
- Barbara Starfield, M.D.
- Blair L. Sadler
- Dan Brock
- Daniel Callahan
- David Durenberger
- Eric Cassell, M.D.
- Eugene Cauvin
- Hans Maarse
- Henry J. Aaron
- J. Wesley Boyd
- Jacqueline R. Fox
- John Geyman, M.D.
- Joseph White
- Joshua Boger
- Joshua T. Cohen
- Kimberly Swartz
- Kristin Voigt
- Leonard Fleck
- Louise B. Russell
- Margaret Davino
- Mark Helfand
- Muriel R. Gillick, M.D.
- Norman Daniels
- Paul T. Menzel
- Peter A. Ubel, M.D.
- Polo Black Golde
- Richard A. Cooper, M.D.
- Richard B. Saltman
- Ruth Faden
- Sharon R. Kaufman
- Solomon R. Benatar
- Steven Pearson, M.D.
- Susan Bartlett Foote
- Susan Gilbert
- The Editors
- Theodore Marmor
Subjects
Blogroll
- Bioethics Forum
- CBO Director's Blog
- Gooznews
- Health Affairs Blog
- Health Care Organizational Ethics
- Health Policy and Communications Blog
- Health Populi
- Health Wonk Review
- Insureblog
- Kaiser Network
- Managed Care Matters
- National Journal Expert Blog on Health Care
- Physicians for a National Health Program
- Prescriptions Blog
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- The Commonwealth Fund
- The Fiscal Times
- The Health Care Blog
- The New Health Dialogue
- The New Old Age
- Wall Street Journal Health Blog
Support
The Health Care Cost Monitor is made possible by Supporting Members of The Hastings Center.
Please consider supporting the Center today with a tax-deductible donation.





Holding the Line on Health Spending
It will probably be years before we can tell whether the health care reform legislation makes a difference to costs, and its effect is likely to be obscured by the poor state of the economy.
There is a lot of speculation about how health care reform will affect health care costs. Some think it will reduce them, others fear it will increase them, and still others see little or no effect at all. The Health Care Cost Monitor invited several of its contributors to give their views in answers to some questions. This is the second in a series of responses. –The Editors
In terms of curbing health care costs, is the health care reform legislation a win, a loss, or neutral?
As a share of our national income, health spending has grown along a straight line for half a century (see chart). Spending rises above the line when economic conditions are bad and national income grows slowly or declines. It falls below the line when national income grows more quickly. But it has never strayed far from the line despite a long history of heralded reforms – certificate of need, professional standards review organizations, prospective payment for hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and more.
We probably won’t be able to tell whether the health reform legislation makes a difference to costs in the next few years. Its effect is likely to be obscured by the poor state of the economy, which will cause health’s share of national income to rise. But even if spending sticks to its historic line, we will at last guarantee health insurance, and with it, basic health care, to everyone.
National Health Spending as a Percent of National Income (Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)
Louise Russell is Research Professor at the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, and Professor in the Department of Economics, Rutgers University. She was a member of the first U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (1984-1988) and co-chaired the U.S. Public Health Service’s Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1993-1996). lrussell@ifh.rutgers.edu; 732-932-6507.